Research without the marketing fog.

Meet the founder

Named editorial responsibility

Peptide Choice Guide is independently edited by Ricardo. We do not present the site as a laboratory, university, medical practice, clinical provider or anonymous “research group.”

A named editor is responsible for the editorial framework and for keeping uncertainty visible. The site does not imply medical, scientific or laboratory credentials that are not stated in the editor profile, and it does not represent its content as peer-reviewed research.

What we are building

What we cover — and what we do not

We publish a selective educational resource, not a catalogue of every peptide or product. We cover research literacy, documentation and dated supplier-transparency information only where we can explain the evidence and its limits clearly.

A supplier evidence review is not a product recommendation. We do not publish treatment claims, personal-use guidance, dosing, reconstitution, injection instructions or unsupported legal or regulatory conclusions.

Visual identity

Our small PCG monogram combines research, comparison and careful reading. Read what the logo represents →

AI-assisted editorial process

AI tools, including ChatGPT, may assist with research organization, drafting, analysis, structure and content development. AI is not treated as a scientific source; factual and scientific claims are checked against their underlying evidence before publication.

Commercial transparency

Peptide Choice Guide may participate in affiliate relationships with companies in the research-supplier market. Commercial relationships are disclosed and kept separate from the criteria used for editorial comparisons and scorecards.

Our methodology

We have published a dedicated Methodology & Editorial Standards page explaining how we approach evidence, supplier information, COAs, rankings and commercial relationships. Our Editorial & Commercial Policy sets the practical boundaries for research scope, affiliate disclosure and corrections.